“It has been claimed that the early-2000s global warming slowdown or hiatus, characterized by a reduced rate of global surface warming, has been overstated, lacks sound scientific basis, or is unsupported by observations. The evidence presented here contradicts these claims,” the paper in Nature Climate Change says.
Though the paper’s findings are not
controversial – few serious scientists dispute the evidence of the
temperature datasets showing that there has been little if any global
warming for nearly 19 years – they represent a tremendous blow to the
climate alarmist “consensus”, which has long sought to deny the
“Pause’s” existence.
First, the study was published in Nature Climate Change a fervently alarmist journal which rarely if ever runs papers that cast doubt on the man-made-global-warming scare narrative.
Secondly, it directly contradicts a widely-reported study produced by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) last year which attempted to deny the existence of the “Pause” (also known as the “hiatus”).
The standard: "Stay on the plantation, or you won't count as black anymore."
No comments:
Post a Comment